Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Scopes, lasers and disposables (part 2)

Panagiotis Mourmouris, Lazaros Lazarou, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos

Abstract


Flexible instrumentation is the mainstay of minimal invasive
stone surgery and this led to the invention of smaller and safer
instruments which performed remarkable good to a variety of
procedures. Further developments like digital technology and
single use ureteroscopes which along with similar technological
advances in lasers and disposables transformed flexible surgery
in a tool of paramount importance in the intrarenal surgery of
various clinical entities. This is the second part of our review of
the literature concerning the advances


Keywords


flexible;ureteroscope;intrarenal surgery;lasers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akar E.C., Knudsen B.E. Evaluation of 16 new holmium:yttriumaluminum-

garnet laser optical fibers for ureteroscopy. Urology.

;86(2):230-5.

Lusch A., Heidari E., Okhunov Z., Osann K., Landman J. Evaluation

of contemporary holmium laser fibers for performance characteristics.

J Endourol. 2016;30(5):567-73.

Wilson C.R., Hardy L.A., Kennedy J.D., Irby P.B., Fried N.M. Miniature

ball-tip optical fibers for use in thulium fiber laser ablation of

kidney stones. J Biomed Opt. 2016;21(1):18003.

Shin R.H., Lautz J.M., Cabrera F.J., Shami C.J., Goldsmith Z.G., Kuntz

N.J., et al. Evaluation of novel ball-tip holmium laser Fiber: impact

on ureteroscope performance and fragmentation efficiency. J

Endourol. 2016;30(2):189-94.

Kronenberg P., Traxer O. Lithotripsy performance of specially designed

laser fiber tips. J Urol. 2016;195(5):1606-12.

Chapman R.A., Somani B.K., Robertson A., Healy S., Kata S.G.

Decreasing cost of flexible ureterorenoscopy: single-use laser

fiber cost analysis. Urology. 2014;83(5):1003-5.

Wollin D.A., Ackerman A., Yang C., Chen T., Simmons W.N., Preminger

GM, et al. Variable pulse duration from a new holm um: YAG

laser: the effect on stone comminution, fiber tip degradation, and

retropulsion in a dusting model. Urology. 2017;103 47-51.

Haddad M., Emiliani E., Rouchausse Y., Coste F., Doizi S., Berthe

L., et al. Impact of the curve diameter and laser settings on laser

fiber fracture. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):918-21.

Kronenberg P., Traxer O. Are we all doing it wrong? Influence of

stripping and cleaving methods of laser fibers on laser lithotripsy

performance. J Urol. 2015;193(3):1030-5.

Ritchie C., Yang P., Peplinski B., Keheila M., Cheriyan S., Abourbih

S., et al. Jackets off: the impact of laser fiber stripping on power

output and stone degradation. J Endourol. 2017;31(8):780-5.

Baghdadi M., Emiliani E., Talso M., Servián P., Barreiro A., Orosa A.,

et al. Comparison of laser fiber passage in ureteroscopic maximum

deflection and their influence on deflection and irrigation: do we

really need the ball tip concept? World J Urol. 2017;35(2):313-8.

Blackmon R.L., Irby, P. B. & Fried N. M. Thulium fibre laser lithotripsy

using tapered fibres. Lasers Surg. Med. 42, 45-50 (2010).

Wilson C. R., Hardy L. A., Kennedy J. D., Irby P. B., Fried N. M. Miniature

ball tip optical fibres for use in Thulium fibre laser ablation

of kidney stones. J. Biomed. Opt. 21, 18003 (2016).14.

Hutchens T. C., Blackmon R. L., Irby P. B., Fried N. M. Detachable

fibre optic tips for use in thulium fibre laser lithotripsy. J. Biomed.

Opt. 18, 38001 (2013).

Hutchens T. C., Gonzalez D. A., Irby P. B., Fried, N. M. Fibre optic muzzle

brake tip for reducing fibre burnback and stone retropulsion during

Thulium fibre laser lithotripsy. J. Biomed. Opt. 22, 18001 (2017).

Takayasu H., Aso, Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy:

guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J. Urol. 112,

-178 (1974).

Al-Qahtani S. M. et al. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible

with your flexible ureteroscope? J. Endourol. 28, 286-290 (2014).

Pedro R.N., Hendlin K., Durfee W.K., Monga M. Physical characteristics

of next-generation ureteral access sheaths: buckling and

kinking. Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):440-2.

Monga M., Gawlik A., Durfee W. Systematic evaluation of ureteral

access sheaths. Urology. 2004 May;63(5):834-6.

Monga .M1, Best S., Venkatesh R., Ames C., Lieber D., Vanlangendock

R. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of 2 ureteral

access sheaths during flexible retrograde ureteroscopy. J Urol.

Aug;172(2):572-3.

Loftus C.J., Ganesan V.2, Traxer O.3, Schold J.D.4, Noble M.2, Sivalingam

S., et al. Ureteral Wall Injury with Ureteral Access Sheaths:

A Randomized Prospective Trial. J Endourol. 2019 Jan 25.

Vanlangendonck R., Landman J. Ureteral access strategies: pro-access

sheath. Urol. Clin. North Am. 31, 71-81 (2004).

Rizkala E. R., Monga M. Controversies in ureteroscopy: wire, basket,

and sheath. Indian J. Urol. 29, 244-248 (2013).

Traxer O., Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification

of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral

access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013

Feb;189(2):580-4.

Traxer O., Wendt-Nordahl G., Sodha H., Rassweiler J., Meretyk

S., Tefekli A. et al. Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes

for patients treated either with or without the support

of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the

Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol.

Dec;33(12):2137-44.

Kourambas J., Byrne R.R., Preminger G.M. (2001) Does a ureteral

access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 165:789-793.

Berquet G., Prunel P., Verhoest G., Mathieu R., Bensalah K. (2014) The

use of ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after

ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J Urol 32:229-232.

Delvecchio F.C.1, Auge B.K., Brizuela R.M., Weizer A.Z., Silverstein

A.D., Lallas C.D., Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral

access sheath. Urology. 2003 Mar;61(3):518-22; discussion 522.

Liguori G., Antoniolli F., Trombetta C., Biasotto M., Amodeo A., Pomara

G., et al. Comparative experimental evaluation of guidewire

use in urology. Urology. 2008 Aug;72(2):286-9; discussion 289-90.

Sarkissian C., et al. (2012) Systematic evaluation of hybrid guidewires:

shaft stiffness, lubricity and tip configuration. Urology

(3):513-517.

Hinck B.D., Emmott A.S., Omar M., Tarplin S., Chew B.H., Monga

M. Hybrid guidewires: Analysis and comparison of the mechanical

properties and safety profiles. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Feb;13(2):59-

doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5396. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

Kourambas J., Delvecchio F.C., Munver R, Preminger GM. Nitinol

stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole

renal calculi. Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):935-9.

Chenven E.S.1, Bagley DH. Retrieval and releasing capabilities of

stone-basket designs in vitro. J Endourol. 2005 Mar;19(2):204-9.

Lukasewycz S., Hoffman N., Botnaru A., Deka P.M., Monga M.

Comparison of tipless and helical baskets in an in vitro ureteral

model. Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):435-8; discussion 438.

Sarkissian C., Marchini G.S., Monga M. Endoscopic forceps for

ureteroscopy: a comparative in vitro analysis. Urology. 2013

Mar;81(3):690-5.

Ptashnyk T., Cueva-Martinez A., Michel M.S., Alken P., Köhrmann

K.U. Comparative investigations on the retrieval capabilities of

various baskets and graspers in four ex vivo models. Eur Urol. 2002

Apr;41(4):406-10.

Shin R.H., Lipkin M.E., Preminger GM. Disposable devices for RIRS:

where do we stand in 2013? What do we need in the future? World

J Urol. 2015 Feb;33(2):241-6.

Tarplin S., Byrne M., Farrell N., Monga M., Sivalingam S. Endoscopic

Valves and Irrigation Devices for Flexible Ureteroscopy: Is There a

Difference? J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):983-92.

Bourdoumis A. et al. (2013) The difficult ureter: stent and come

back or balloon dilate and proceed with ureteroscopy? What does

the evidence say? Urology 83(1):1-3.

Kuntz N. et al. (2013) Balloon dilation of the ureter: a contemporary

review of outcomes and complications. J Endourol 27:a402.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19264/hj.v31i2.267