The role of radical surgery in the treatment of lymph node positive prostate cancer

Filippos Kapogiannis, Charalambos Fasoulakis

Abstract


There is no clear consensus on how to manage a subset of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who present with involved lymph nodes (LN+). Although outcomes for these patients are uniformly worse than those for patients with localized PCa, they are better than outcomes for patients with bone metastases, with more than 60% of patients alive at 10 years after the initial diagnosis. Although radical prostatectomies in patients with clinical lymphadenopathy were abandoned in the era before widespread adoption of PSA screening, radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy can help achieve durable cancer control in the contemporary practise. The use of multimodal treatment, including surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy, and ADT, is particularly relevant for younger patients who are at high risk for local and distant relapse over the course of their lives and who may need all treatments to achieve optimal outcomes. Although there is a lack of data from prospective randomized trials directly comparing radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy, retrospective studies and registries suggest that surgery may offer benefits in terms of biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, prostate-cancer-specific mortality, and overall survival.


Keywords


lymph node positive prostate cancer (N+ PCa); radical prostatectomy (RP); pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND); multimodal therapy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Frohmuller HG, Theiss M, Manseck A, Wirth MP. Survival and quality of life of patients with stage D1(T1-3pN1-2M0) prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy plus androgen deprivation versus androgen deprivation alone. EurUrol 1995;27: 202-206.

Weingartner K, Ramaswamy A, Bittinger A, Gerharz EW, Voge D, Riedmiller H. Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: Results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J Urol 1996;156: 1969-1971.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19264/hj.v29i4.211